BARGONextGen Bar Prep
Exam guideStatesCurriculumPricingBlogFree study planFAQ
Home/Subjects/Criminal Law & Constitutional Protections
CRM11 topics377 practice questions

NextGen Bar Exam Criminal Law & Constitutional Protections.

Statutory crimes, defenses, and the constitutional protections of accused persons.

Get full CRM accessGet a free study plan

All 11 topics in Criminal Law & Constitutional Protections

Scope-aligned

★ marks the 5 topics NCBE flags at memorize level — know these cold; the rest lean on provided materials and reasoning.

  1. 01

    Mental States & General Principles

    General principles of criminal liability: acts and omissions (voluntariness, possession as an act); states of mind (intent or purpose, knowledge, recklessness, criminal negligence, mistake of fact or law); criminal jurisdiction; and burdens of proof and persuasion.

    Free
  2. 02

    Defenses

    Defenses to criminal liability: provocation (cooling time and rekindling), voluntary and involuntary intoxication, self-defense (stand your ground, duty to retreat, castle doctrine, initial aggressor), defense of others, and defense of property.

  3. 03

    Homicide (statutory)

    Statutory homicide: levels of intent applied to homicide, intentional murder (premeditated and impulsive), manslaughter (provocation or extreme emotional disturbance, and recklessness), unintentional and negligent homicide, felony murder, and vehicular manslaughter.

  4. 04

    Property & Person Crimes (statutory)

    Statutory crimes against property and persons: theft and aggravated theft, burglary, robbery, and assault and battery, together with the defenses to these crimes.

  5. 05

    Possession, Trafficking & DUI Offenses

    Statutory possession and trafficking offenses (drugs, guns, or contraband; possession with intent to distribute) and operating a motor vehicle while impaired or under the influence, together with the defenses to these crimes.

  6. 06

    Inchoate Crimes & Parties

    Inchoate crimes and parties to a crime: attempt (actus reus and the substantial-step test, merger, and lesser included offenses), conspiracy (elements, defenses, and coconspirator liability), and accomplices and accessories before and after the fact.

  7. 07

    4th Am: Searches★

    Fourth Amendment searches: the reasonable expectation of privacy (open fields, surveillance, technological information gathering, false friends, dog sniffs, curtilage); reasonable suspicion and probable cause; and administrative and suspicionless searches.

  8. 08

    4th Am: Seizures & Warrants★

    Fourth Amendment seizures and warrants: search-warrant requirements and exceptions (search incident to arrest, automobile, plain view, consent, stop-and-frisk, hot pursuit, exigent circumstances), proper warrant execution, and seizures of persons (Terry stops and arrests).

  9. 09

    Exclusionary Rule★

    The exclusionary rule and its exceptions (fruit of the poisonous tree, independent source, inevitable discovery, good faith, impeachment) and standing to object, including coconspirators and third parties, and the state-action doctrine.

  10. 10

    5th Am & Miranda★

    The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination (testimonial versus nontestimonial, the incrimination standard); the triggering, adequacy, invoking, and waiving of Miranda rights; involuntariness under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments; and the related exclusionary rule.

  11. 11

    6th Am Counsel & Trial Rights★

    The Sixth Amendment right to counsel (when it attaches, waiver, ineffective assistance, and counsel of choice); the right to disclosure of exculpatory and impeachment evidence; due process implications of identification procedures (lineups, showups, photo arrays); and the right to trial by jury.

Try before you buy

4 sample CRM questions

Real questions from the Criminal Law & Constitutional Protections bank, with the full explanation. The paid bank covers all 11 topics and difficulty levels.

While shopping in a grocery store, Owen suffers a sudden epileptic seizure — his first ever, with no prior symptoms or diagnosis. During the seizure his arm swings out violently and strikes an elderly customer beside him, who falls and fractures her hip. The state charges Owen with battery, defined as unlawfully causing bodily injury to another. Owen had taken no medication, had never been warned of any seizure risk, and had no reason to expect the episode. His lawyer moves to dismiss, arguing the prosecution cannot establish an essential requirement of criminal liability.

What is Owen's strongest argument for dismissal?

  1. He did not intend to make contact with the customer.
  2. The contact was neither harmful nor offensive to the customer.
  3. His movement during the seizure was not a voluntary act. Correct
  4. He was legally insane at the moment of the seizure.
Why: Every crime requires an actus reus, and that must include a voluntary act — a willed muscular movement. A seizure is the textbook involuntary act: the arm swings on its own, not by Owen's choice, so there is no voluntary act to punish, and (C) is the cleanest ground for dismissal. The facts deliberately foreclose the 'earlier voluntary act' trap — a first-ever seizure with no warning means Owen made no earlier culpable choice, like driving while knowing he might black out. (A) is tempting but weaker: battery needs only general intent or recklessness, and the deeper defect is that no voluntary act occurred at all. (B) is wrong — a fall breaking a hip is plainly harmful. (D) misfires: a seizure is not a mental disease producing insanity.

Relaxing on the shore of a lake, Grant notices a stranger flailing in the water about fifteen feet away. A flotation ring hangs on a post within his reach, and tossing it would take almost no effort. Grant has never met the stranger, did nothing to put her in the water, and owes her no special obligation. Irritated at having his quiet afternoon interrupted, he ignores her and returns to his book. The stranger drowns. Prosecutors consider charging Grant with criminal homicide based solely on his failure to throw the ring.

Is Grant likely criminally liable for the death?

  1. Yes, because he could easily have saved her life with the ring.
  2. Yes, because his indifference to her plight was morally blameworthy.
  3. No, because he did nothing to place the stranger in danger.
  4. No, because he owed the stranger no legal duty to act. Correct
Why: The law generally imposes no duty to be a Good Samaritan: watching a stranger drown, however heartless, is not a crime, because an omission is criminal only when the defendant had a legal duty to act. Grant had no statute, status relationship, contract, prior assumption of care, or role in creating the peril — so no duty arose and he cannot be convicted (D). (A) describes a moral duty, not a legal one; ease of rescue creates no liability. (B) points to Grant's ugly state of mind, but a blameworthy attitude cannot substitute for the missing duty. (C) is a true fact that hints at the right idea — he did not create the danger — but it names only one of the five duty sources; the complete answer is that none of them applies to him.

The state police lawfully stop a car registered to and driven by Nadia. In the locked glovebox they find an unregistered handgun; Nadia holds the only key, and no one else has used the car in weeks. Nadia is charged with unlawful possession of a firearm. She argues she cannot be possessing the gun because it was locked away and never in her hands. The prosecutor responds that Nadia exercised dominion and control over the weapon even though it was not on her body.

Which concept best supports the prosecutor's position?

  1. Transferred intent.
  2. Constructive possession. Correct
  3. Strict liability.
  4. Vicarious liability.
Why: Possession need not be actual (physically on the person); it can be constructive — dominion and control over an item without holding it, such as contraband in a locked glovebox to which the defendant alone has the key (B). Nadia's exclusive access is the control the law calls possession, so her 'it wasn't in my hands' argument fails. Transferred intent (A) is unrelated; it moves a defendant's intent from an intended victim to an unintended one and has nothing to do with possessing property. Strict liability (C) describes offenses needing no mental state — not the doctrine explaining how someone 'possesses' a hidden object. Vicarious liability (D) holds one person responsible for another's acts, but the gun is tied to Nadia's own control, not someone else's conduct.

A statute defines burglary as 'breaking and entering the dwelling of another at night with the intent to commit a felony therein.' One night Wes pries open a window and climbs into a house he wrongly believes is empty and abandoned. His plan is only to sleep somewhere warm; he intends no theft or other felony inside. A patrol officer finds him asleep on the couch and arrests him. Wes is charged with burglary, and his attorney argues that a key element of the offense is missing.

Why is Wes most likely not guilty of burglary as defined?

  1. He honestly believed the house was empty and abandoned.
  2. He did not break the window but merely pried it open.
  3. Sleeping inside a dwelling is not itself a criminal act.
  4. He lacked the intent to commit a felony inside the dwelling. Correct
Why: Burglary is a specific-intent crime: on top of the breaking and entering, the statute demands a further, particular objective — the intent to commit a felony inside. Wes broke in only to sleep, so that special intent is absent and the offense is incomplete (D). This is why the specific/general-intent label matters — without the extra objective the crime simply does not form. (A) points to an honest mistake, but his belief that the house was empty neither supplies nor negates the missing felonious intent; it is beside the point. (B) is wrong on the law: prying open a window is a 'breaking,' and entering followed. (C) is true but irrelevant — the charge is burglary, complete at entry with the required intent, not mere trespassory sleeping.
Unlock the full CRM bank14-day money-back · one-time payment

Free study plan

Studying Criminal Law & Constitutional Protections? Start with a plan.

Tell us your exam date and we’ll email you a week-by-week schedule that gives Criminal Law & Constitutional Protections the time it needs — alongside the other subjects.

Target administration
Hours per week
Pathway

No spam. Unsubscribe in one click. We’ll send 3 follow-ups with bar exam study tips.

Common questions

Criminal Law & Constitutional Protections FAQs

Statutory crimes, defenses, and the constitutional protections of accused persons. The published content scope breaks it into 11 topics, examined through both MCQ formats plus integrated question sets and performance tasks.
11. Our notes are mapped one-to-one against NCBE's published content scope, and starred topics mark what NCBE flags at memorize level.
Active recall beats re-reading. Read the notes once, then practice exam-format questions in mixed order, then revisit weak topics. Our weak-area tracker surfaces the topics dragging your accuracy down.
Yes. The free diagnostic quiz is open to everyone, free accounts get the first topic of every subject — notes included — plus 5 premium questions a day. The full CRM bank (377 questions today) is unlocked with a one-time purchase and covered by the 14-day money-back guarantee.
14-day money-back guarantee

Ready to start preparing?

One-time payment. Pick the plan that fits your timeline. Start with the free readiness quiz.

Free readiness quizView pricing

Enjoying this? Unlock every topic, practice exams & flashcards.

View Pricing
BARGONextGen Bar Prep

Affordable NextGen bar exam preparation — practice questions, question sets, performance tasks, and in-depth study notes built around how the exam actually works.

Product

  • Features
  • How it works
  • Curriculum
  • Pricing
  • iOS app

Resources

  • NextGen exam guide
  • States & passing scores
  • Free study plan
  • Free diagnostic quiz
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Refund
  • Cookies
  • AI Policy
  • Support

BARGO is an independent study platform. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by NCBE. NCBE®, NextGen UBE®, MBE®, and UBE® are trademarks of the National Conference of Bar Examiners. All questions, flashcards, and notes are original works based on NCBE’s published Content Scope Outline — they are not real exam questions. Content is provided for educational purposes only, does not constitute legal advice, and no exam result is guaranteed.

© 2026 BARGO · Sitemap